Author
Listed:
- Zhenpeng Zou
- Jonathan Corcoran
- Thomas Sigler
- Elin Charles-Edwards
Abstract
Following nearly a decade of unabated growth in the digitally disruptive short-term rental (STR) sector, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 caused a relatively abrupt two-year industry contraction characterised by substantial reductions in participating properties and booking activities. Given the sudden opportunity to rethink how STR markets fit alongside more traditional accommodation arrangements, this unanticipated Black Swan event catalysed much debate about the role that STRs play, and how they are regulated and managed. As the STR market rebounds toward a ‘new normal’, a timely opportunity exists to understand and theorise how and where the industry evolves. In this paper, we apply regression modelling and descriptive statistics to compare STR property utilisation across four regional markets in Australia both before and after the pandemic. We observe a sharp reduction yet strong intensification in available properties after the COVID-19 pandemic, with 27% fewer properties that were booked 26% more often across the nation. This was led by a significant geographical shift from capital cities to high-amenity, tourist-focused regions. Our findings suggest that this pivot is driven by spatial market segmentation, in which urban STRs are operated professionally, whereas regional markets are distinguished by their amenity value, both at the regional and property scales. Combined, the results of this study point to a more professionalised STR hosting landscape in which properties are more intensively used. Any potential policy reform should consider this evolution in the STR accommodation sector.
Suggested Citation
Zhenpeng Zou & Jonathan Corcoran & Thomas Sigler & Elin Charles-Edwards, 2024.
"Reset or renaissance? An exploratory comparison of pre- and post-pandemic regional short-term rental markets in Australia,"
Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 614-631, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:614-631
DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2024.2402479
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:614-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsrs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.