IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrexx/v9y2017i1p66-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impacts of Gasoline Stations on Residential Property Values: A Case Study in Xuancheng, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qinna Zhao
  • Mengling Liu
  • Qi Chen

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the effect of gasoline stations on residential multifamily housing prices in Xuancheng, China. First, a survey examining beliefs and the Not in My Backyard (NIMBY) issues associated with gasoline stations investigated the public attitude toward the impact of gasoline stations. The results show that, although the gasoline stations have adopted advanced safety management, 86% of people believe that they will decrease nearby housing prices. Second, in March and April 2016, a hedonic pricing model was used to measure the impact of gas stations on the sales' prices of 601 residential units in 22 multifamily neighborhoods that are up to 1,000 meters from the gas stations. The results show that housing prices increase significantly with every additional kilometer from the nearest gasoline station, and the closer to the gasoline station that the house is, the more negative the impact on the housing price. The closest 100-meter band showed almost a 16% reduction in housing price, and the furthest affected band (301–600 meters) was down by almost 9%. The negative effect was not observed at distances beyond 600 meters.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinna Zhao & Mengling Liu & Qi Chen, 2017. "The Impacts of Gasoline Stations on Residential Property Values: A Case Study in Xuancheng, China," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 66-85, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:66-85
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12091901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2017.12091901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2017.12091901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:66-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsre20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.