IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrexx/v9y2017i1p153-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quadruple Bottom Line: Tenant Views of Corporate Responsibility in Green Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Robert A. Simons
  • Spenser Robinson
  • Eunkyu Lee
  • Albert Bragg

Abstract

This research expands the traditional triple bottom line (people, profit, and planet) by splitting profit based on benefits from resource savings or productivity enhancements. In the context of corporate real estate, the suggested quadruple bottom line (PPPP) is defined as general environmental goals (planet), employees' productivity (people), the tenant firm's profitability (profit T), and landlord's profit (profit L). Tenants' perspectives on specific sustainability categories and the relative importance of PPPP are examined through a survey of over 700 tenants in U.S. office buildings. The findings suggest that different ways of evaluating the direction of profit is warranted, because tenants' attitudes toward profit diverge significantly when landlord profit and tenant profit are considered separately based on lease structure. The results also suggest that while planet, or resource conservation, is a major priority for tenant respondents, detailed analysis of sustainability components shows that people, a proxy for occupant well-being and productivity gains, are the highest priority. This is of particular importance in sustainable real estate as new products and developments are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert A. Simons & Spenser Robinson & Eunkyu Lee & Albert Bragg, 2017. "The Quadruple Bottom Line: Tenant Views of Corporate Responsibility in Green Office Buildings," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 153-171, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:153-171
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12091896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2017.12091896
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2017.12091896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:153-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsre20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.