IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrexx/v16y2024i1p2407221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Return of Green Buildings—Equally Low Vacancies and Higher Rents in MINERGIE-Certified Apartments in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Kempf

Abstract

This study examines whether MINERGIE-certified multifamily houses exhibit higher occupancies in Switzerland; that is, better rentability and less risk. Various studies have shown that green buildings exhibit higher rents and sales prices than conventional properties. However, a risk–return-conscious investor needs to consider both dimensions. Thus far, little empirical research has been conducted concerning the risk side; that is, the occupancies of green residential buildings. This study estimates rents and occupancies in a structural simultaneous equation system. The regression results show robust estimates for the two-stage least squares instrumental variables approach and the ordinary least squares regressions. The hedonic regression results reveal no statistically significant effect on occupancies, though they show a green rent premium of approximately 3% to 5%. Against the background of a lessor market with demand exceeding supply, the advantages of a MINERGIE-certified house—that is, lower energy costs and better living quality and comfort—yield an increased willingness to pay. Given the excess demand in the Swiss housing market, no green risk-mitigating advantages in rentability—that is, an increased occupancy premium—could be identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Kempf, 2024. "Risk and Return of Green Buildings—Equally Low Vacancies and Higher Rents in MINERGIE-Certified Apartments in Switzerland," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 2407221-240, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:2407221
    DOI: 10.1080/19498276.2024.2407221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19498276.2024.2407221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19498276.2024.2407221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:2407221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsre20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.