IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrexx/v16y2024i1p2356715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Energy Performance Rating Affect Office Rents? A Study of the UK Office Market

Author

Listed:
  • Qiulin Ke
  • Michael White

Abstract

Environmental concerns and the rise in energy costs have heightened the focus on reducing CO2 emissions within the built environment. By concentrating on the office market in the UK, where a significant portion of a service-based economy operates, progress towards achieving emission reduction goals could be accelerated. Nevertheless, the speed at which this sector can enhance its environmental impact and whether individuals are willing to invest in energy-efficient measures and new energy-efficient buildings has remained uncertain. This paper investigates the influence of varying Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) ratings on the rental rates of office buildings in the UK, drawing on an extensive dataset spanning the years of 2011–2021. Our research seeks to determine whether there exists a willingness to pay for more energy-efficient office spaces by assessing whether there is a rental premium associated with office building with higher EPC ratings. Furthermore, we examine whether buildings failing to meet minimum energy efficiency standard (defined as EPC ratings of F and G) experience rental discounts. Our findings, which take into account heteroscedasticity and various disaggregations within the office market, consistently reveal a willingness to pay for energy-efficient office spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiulin Ke & Michael White, 2024. "Does Energy Performance Rating Affect Office Rents? A Study of the UK Office Market," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 2356715-235, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:2356715
    DOI: 10.1080/19498276.2024.2356715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19498276.2024.2356715
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19498276.2024.2356715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:2356715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsre20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.