IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrexx/v10y2018i1p59-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study: Brownfield Externalities' Valuation in Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qinna Zhao
  • Qixin Xu
  • Mengling Liu

Abstract

Brownfields can have a number of adverse effects on the local environment and social welfare, including diminution of property values. Although many brownfield sites exist in China, there has been relatively little research done to quantify the negative externality affects there. This study considers the effects of reclaimed brownfield sites on residential property values in Wuhan City, Hubei province. A hedonic pricing model is used on the sale of more than 850 residential units in almost 31 multifamily buildings within 5 kilometers of brownfield sites in December 2015. Results show that proximate properties show decreases in their initial listing price of up to 3.3%, and using the distance-rings approach, the effect manifested as an approximately 7.4% reduction in value within the ring closest to the site. The adverse price effects diminish as the distances to the brownfield sites increase. The result for spatial autocorrelation shows that moving further away from the brownfield is associated with an increased list price, at a rate of 3.7% per kilometer, which does not change our conclusion that brownfields significantly affect housing prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinna Zhao & Qixin Xu & Mengling Liu, 2018. "Case Study: Brownfield Externalities' Valuation in Wuhan, China," Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 59-80, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:59-80
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2018.12091912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2018.12091912
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2018.12091912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrexx:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:59-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsre20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.