IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v9y2014i3p338-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The crisis in economics: What can it tell us about social science?

Author

Listed:
  • Martyn Hammersley

Abstract

The discipline of economics is currently facing a severe crisis, in the wake of the financial collapse of 2008. But there have been growing criticisms of the discipline, from within as well as from outside, for over two decades. In this paper the lessons that can be learned from this crisis by other social sciences are examined. It is argued that the main source of the problem is not so much the character of the discipline itself as the public role that it has been assigned, and taken on, purporting to offer a comprehensive practical perspective that serves as a basis for policy-making, and for practical decision-making more generally. Many social scientists crave a similar role for their own discipline, or for a broader interdisciplinary social science. In this article, I argue that this represents a failure to learn the lesson that the crisis in economics teaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Martyn Hammersley, 2014. "The crisis in economics: What can it tell us about social science?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 338-344, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:9:y:2014:i:3:p:338-344
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2014.943275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2014.943275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2014.943275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip A. Klein, 2006. "Economics Confronts the Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2385.
    2. Alfred S. Eichner, 1983. "Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 507-520, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Bijou & Lester, David, 1995. "New directions for economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 433-446.
    2. Andrew Sheng & Kian Teng Kwek & Cho Wai Cho, 2012. "Patterns Of Exchange Rates And Current Accounts: The East Asian Waltz," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 57(02), pages 1-34.
    3. Onye, Kenneth U., 2016. "Neoclassical Economics: The Need for a Reconstruction," MPRA Paper 88473, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Krstic, Bojan & Krstic, Milos, 2015. "Rational Choice Theory And Random Behaviour," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 61(1), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Slavica Manic, PhD, 2014. "Has Economics Lost Its Own Identity?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(9), pages 1190-1200, September.
    6. Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "Veblen’s evolutionary methodology and its implications for heterodox economics in the calculable future," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 277-295, July.
    7. Gonzalo Caballero, 2004. "Instituciones e historia económica: enfoques y teorías institucionales," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 6(10), pages 135-157, January-J.
    8. Vergés-Jaime, Joaquim, 2020. "Economics as a Science -or viewed from the perspective of scientists in other fields," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 247-257.
    9. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. & Magnus, Jan R., 1995. "On tests and significance in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 5-24, May.
    11. Karbowski, Adam, 2011. "Sądy postulatywne w ekonomii głównego nurtu [Postulative Claims in Mainstream Economics]," MPRA Paper 69603, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2013. "Uncertainty, Instability, and the Control of Markets," MPRA Paper 47936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Irene van Staveren, 2012. "An Evolutionary Efficiency Alternative to the Notion of Pareto Efficiency," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, July.
    14. James E. Sawyer, 2009. "Anti-Sustainability Rhetoric: Sketching Ideological Responses," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 49-71.
    15. Frederic S. Lee, 2012. "Heterodox Economics and its Critics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 337-351, April.
    16. Chamilall Neelkant S., 2000. "La Genese Du Label Autricheen': La Pensee De Carl Menger," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 53-118, March.
    17. Emily Northrop, 2000. "Normative Foundations of Introductory Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 44(1), pages 53-61, March.
    18. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2012. "Why Post Keynesianism is not yet a science," MPRA Paper 43171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ross, Bruce W., 1996. "Towards an observational economics of business behaviour: the horizontal supply curve, 'fuzzy' demand and other anomalies for conventional theory," MPRA Paper 26783, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "The Truly General Theory of Employment: How Keynes Could Have Succeeded," MPRA Paper 54367, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:9:y:2014:i:3:p:338-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.