IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v19y2024i4p407-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place, devolution and industrial strategy: three key tests for labour

Author

Listed:
  • David Bailey
  • Paul Hildreth

Abstract

On 4 July 2024, the UK elected the first Labour Government for fourteen years. On 30 October 2024, the new Labour Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented her first budget of the new administration, promising to restore economic stability and ‘begin a decade of national renewal’. Commentators quickly observed similarities in approach to that of the former 1997–2008 Labour Chancellor Gordon Brown. This paper considers the new government’s likely approach to levelling up (or reducing regional inequalities). It compares its economic framework to the Labour Government of 1997–2010 and subsequent Coalition and Conservative governments, to see what it might learn. We then consider some key tests for Labour for place, devolution and industrial strategy, which underpin Labour’s ambition to realise the economic potential of different areas within the UK. We argue that Labour must break from the neoclassical base that has dominated UK economic policymaking in its various related forms for the past 30 years. This base has enabled a largely space-neutral and conditional approach to subnational policy and has mitigated against the development of regional industrial policies.

Suggested Citation

  • David Bailey & Paul Hildreth, 2024. "Place, devolution and industrial strategy: three key tests for labour," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 407-423, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:19:y:2024:i:4:p:407-423
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2024.2443463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2024.2443463
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2024.2443463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:19:y:2024:i:4:p:407-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.