IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v19y2024i1-3p283-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonisation, place attachment and agency: just transition in old industrial regions

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Norris
  • Gillian Bristow
  • Eleanor Cotterill
  • Adrian Healy
  • Adam P. Marshall

Abstract

There is growing awareness that the effects of decarbonisation are highly spatial and will impact regions differentially. Old industrial regions are likely to be particularly affected but it is debateable how well equipped they are to engage with transition and for it to be just. Extant literature suggests that this will be highly contingent on the acceptability of this transition amongst old industrial communities, with a call to understand what and who will be impacted. There is, however, a need for more granularity of evidence on how acceptability is formed and how it plays out in practice. Taking the case of Port Talbot in the UK, this paper provides new insights into the interplay between place attachment and a ‘just transition’ in an old industrial region. This paper finds that there is a strong community understanding of and support for decarbonisation but an equally strong perception of powerlessness to act. There is an enduring sense of place attachment within Port Talbot but the lack of place-based consultation and engagement with the community means that there are no effective development strategies in place. Thus, it can be concluded that there is acceptability but without agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Norris & Gillian Bristow & Eleanor Cotterill & Adrian Healy & Adam P. Marshall, 2024. "Decarbonisation, place attachment and agency: just transition in old industrial regions," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1-3), pages 283-302, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:19:y:2024:i:1-3:p:283-302
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2024.2323106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2024.2323106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2024.2323106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:19:y:2024:i:1-3:p:283-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.