IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v28y2025i1p173-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport

Author

Listed:
  • Calvin Nite
  • Marvin Washington

Abstract

While there is a rich tradition of understanding the impact of institutional logics on sport organizational activity, questions remain about how the logics themselves are created and remain historically dominant. This research is an attempt to address this concern by examining how the dominant logic of a sport institution was created and institutionalized. Drawing on historical institutionalism as our methodological guide, this research provides the account of how the NCAA created its amateur logic. The findings of this work suggest three processes: pollination (changing the British notion of amateurism to a US ethos), cultivation (creating and enforcing policy), and perennialization (creating new terms to withstand legal scrutiny, creating executive director role, and building “place”). We introduce the notion of logic work to explain how sport institutions craft their dominant organizing rationales to accommodate diverse interests within institutional settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvin Nite & Marvin Washington, 2025. "Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 173-199, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:173-199
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2024.2403725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2024.2403725
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2024.2403725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:173-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.