Author
Listed:
- Jordan T. Bakhsh
- Jonathan Robertson
- Katie Rowe
Abstract
Mixed methods research integrates qualitative and quantitative methods into a harmonised approach. Over time, conducting mixed methods research has become increasingly popular within sport management scholarship. Since applications differ across fields, it is imperative to review the state of mixed methods research within sport management to consolidate our current knowledge and enhance future practices and contributions. The aim of this study is to review the prevalence of mixed methods research in sport management scholarship, assess its quality and methodological contributions, and provide direction to help scholars write (and review) mixed methods research in our field. We conduct a scoping review of 133 sport management related mixed methods studies. Our analysis identifies the prevalence of authors, journals, year, design, samples, data collection, and data analysis. Borrowing from critical insight within mixed methods scholarship, we assess each study’s mixed methods quality (i.e. justification, type, distinct results, and mixing) and methodological contributions. Our review yields three novel contributions. First, we provide an overview of mixed methods research in sport management scholarship, highlighting a substantial publication increase since 2020. Second, despite the increasing frequency of mixed methods research, we identify that sport management scholarship infrequently produces high-quality studies relative to common standards developed by leading mixed methods scholars. The final contribution of this study is that we provide direction for writing (and reviewing) mixed methods research in sport management scholarship. To do so, we present four paths with indicative questions to help scholars develop stronger mixed methods sections, integrations, visualisations, and contributions.
Suggested Citation
Jordan T. Bakhsh & Jonathan Robertson & Katie Rowe, 2024.
"Mixed methods in sport management: A review and directions for future research,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 682-703, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:5:p:682-703
DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2024.2347004
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:5:p:682-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.