IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v27y2024i3p455-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived event impacts of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games on residents’ eudaimonic well-being: a longitudinal study of within-person changes and relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Keita Kinoshita
  • Satoshi Usami
  • Hirotaka Matsuoka

Abstract

The present study investigated 1) the changes in positive and negative event impacts and residents’ eudaimonic well-being before and after Tokyo 2020 and 2) how the social impacts are related to eudaimonic well-being. Three-wave panel data were collected from 1692 Japanese residents before and after the event. We performed linear mixed modeling (LMM) and a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to investigate the within-person fluctuations in the event impacts and eudaimonic well-being and the within-person relationships. The LMMs showed that only negative event impacts significantly changed after the event. The RI-CLPM revealed that positive event impacts before the event were significantly related to eudaimonic well-being right after the event, and eudaimonic well-being right after the event was significantly associated with positive event impacts two months after the event. The findings indicate that the influence of positive event impacts on residents’ eudaimonic well-being might be only temporal, but also eudaimonic well-being right after the event may have a significant role in positive evaluations of the event two months later. The results illustrated that the government and sport organizations need to pay more attention to contemplate the strategies to increase the eudaimonic well-being of residents through the power of sport to make “sport as an enabler of sustainable development”.

Suggested Citation

  • Keita Kinoshita & Satoshi Usami & Hirotaka Matsuoka, 2024. "Perceived event impacts of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games on residents’ eudaimonic well-being: a longitudinal study of within-person changes and relationships," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 455-479, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:3:p:455-479
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2023.2300160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2023.2300160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2023.2300160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:3:p:455-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.