IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v26y2023i5p788-812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bad bet for sports fans: the case for ending the “gamblification” of sport

Author

Listed:
  • Nerilee Hing
  • Matthew Rockloff
  • Matthew Browne

Abstract

A “gamblification” of sport has occurred over the last 25 years. Sports betting operators are now major sponsors of sport, and gambling activities and cultures are firmly embedded into sport. This paper considers the key issues affecting harmful gambling amongst sport audiences arising from this gamblification and implications for sport management. A narrative literature review identifies seven key issues: 1) harmful sports betting and negative consequences, 2) increased access to sports betting through smartphones, 3) innovated betting options that appeal most to bettors already experiencing gambling harm, 4) how advertising exacerbates harmful betting, 5) the normalisation of sports betting amongst sports fans, 6) impacts on children and adolescents, and 7) the heightened risk of harmful betting amongst sports participants. Sports organisations play an instrumental role in the gamblification of sport and derive revenues from wagering operators that are, in large part, derived from harmful gambling by sports fans. Rising community backlash against the normalisation of sports betting, and increasing regulatory restrictions on sports betting sponsorship and advertising, suggest that gambling sponsorship of sports will increasingly become untenable. Sports organisations need to plan for a future without wagering sponsorships and use their considerable influence to reduce gambling harm amongst their fans, players and broader communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerilee Hing & Matthew Rockloff & Matthew Browne, 2023. "A bad bet for sports fans: the case for ending the “gamblification” of sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 788-812, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:5:p:788-812
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2023.2260079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2023.2260079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2023.2260079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:5:p:788-812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.