Author
Listed:
- Ashley Gardner
- Adam Love
- Steven Waller
Abstract
Sport organizations frequently present themselves as committed to diversity and inclusion by creating an array of policies, programs and other initiatives. However, this image of diversity and inclusion is often not reflected in actual organizational practices, as leadership positions remain largely dominated by White men. To investigate the ways in which elite sport organizations frame diversity and inclusion, the current study analyzed documents produced by the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Football League and the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee. Using principles of critical race theory as a framework, the findings illustrate ways in which these organizations frame diversity generally and racial diversity specifically. While each organization publicized numerous policies, programs, events and other initiatives ostensibly intended to promote diversity and inclusion, the terms “racism” or “sexism” did not appear once in their materials. Ultimately, if organizations fail to recognize and address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to social justice. Sport organizations use a variety of policies, programs and other initiatives to demonstrate their commitment to diversity and inclusion.The actions of sport organizations often fail to align with the commitment to diversity expressed in their policies and statements.An examination of documents from elite sport organizations indicated they frame diversity in a way that obscures structural forces, such as racism and sexism.If organizations fail to address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to diversity.
Suggested Citation
Ashley Gardner & Adam Love & Steven Waller, 2023.
"How Do Elite Sport Organizations Frame Diversity and Inclusion?A Critical Race Analysis,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 339-360, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:3:p:339-360
DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2022.2062975
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:3:p:339-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.