Author
Listed:
- Kevin Filo
- Nicholas Hookway
- Matthew Wade
- Catherine Palmer
Abstract
The employment of online peer-to-peer fundraising has become a critical aspect of the charity sport event experience. Charity sport event participants are encouraged and often requiredto fundraise as part of their involvement. Within this fundraising, participants increasingly use online peer-to-peer fundraising to solicit donations. The current research examines online peer-to-peer fundraising from the perspective of charity sport event donors. Guided by the diffusion of innovation theory and sociological approaches to technology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had made an online donation in support of a charity sport event participant in the previous 12 months (N= 24). Four themes emerged from the interviews: technological detachment, technology eases pressure, saturated market, and cause integrity. These themes highlight concerns with the relative advantage inherent to online peer-to-peer fundraising as well as the importance of addressing technological adoption as a social process between users and technologies. The findings provide implications for event managers and charity managers to empower fundraisers to engage further with prospective donors through both online and in-person communication.Online peer-to-peer fundraising within charity sport events is investigated.Charity sport event donor perspectives are solicited through semi-structured interviews.Four themes emerged from the data suggesting some receptivity along with apprehensions towards the number of solicitations and causes.Charity sport event managers should empower and educate fundraisers and donors.
Suggested Citation
Kevin Filo & Nicholas Hookway & Matthew Wade & Catherine Palmer, 2022.
"An exploration of charity sport event donor perceptions of online peer-to-peer fundraising mechanisms,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 847-870, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:25:y:2022:i:5:p:847-870
DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2021.1993645
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:25:y:2022:i:5:p:847-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.