Author
Listed:
- Elizabeth A. Taylor
- Rose Marie Ward
- Matt R. Huml
- Lindsey Darvin
Abstract
Research examining workplace behaviors has increased over the last 20 years; however, much of this research within the sport context has looked at these issues using a variable-centered approach (e.g., examining work–life interface of mothers). This type of research is useful in describing how work behaviors manifest within specific populations. It does not, however, tell us about how the interaction of multiple variables impacts outcomes. Using social role theory as the guiding framework, the purpose of the study was to examine the presence of naturally occurring groups across a range of workplace behaviors within intercollegiate athletic department employees (N = 4,672) using latent profile analysis. Results indicate naturally occurring groups are present, and contrary to prior research, women were overrepresented in groups with lower levels of conflict (i.e., work–family and family–work) and underrepresented in groups with the higher levels of conflict, whereas men tended to be overrepresented in groups with higher levels of conflict and underrepresented in groups with lower levels of conflict. Further, both men and women with children were overrepresented in the profiles with higher levels of conflict. This work has important theoretical and practical implications for workplace behavior and organizational leadership.Examines workplace behaviors of college sport employees using latent profile analysis.Women tended to be overrepresented in groups with lower levels of work–family/family–work conflict.Participants with children reported higher levels of work–family/family–work conflict.WFC experienced by participants has a greater relationship with burnout and work addiction than FWC.
Suggested Citation
Elizabeth A. Taylor & Rose Marie Ward & Matt R. Huml & Lindsey Darvin, 2022.
"Examining intercollegiate athletic department employees’ workplace behaviors using latent profile analysis,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 162-187, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:162-187
DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2021.1899720
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:162-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.