Author
Listed:
- Stephen L. Shapiro
- Joris Drayer
- Brendan Dwyer
Abstract
•Psychological reactance theory was examined in the context of sports gambling and daily fantasy sport.•An experimental design was used to test the impact of proposed restrictions on consumer behavioral intentions.•Significant differences were found between high and low levels of consumer reactance to proposed government restrictions.•Results regarding restrictions to freedom were contrary to previous literature on consumer reactance.•Consumer reactance should be considered as governments decide on sports gaming legislation.According to psychological reactance theory (PRT), when an individual’s freedom is threatened or eliminated, a state of reactance will occur in an attempt to have the freedom restored. Consumer reactance to firm marketing strategies and governmental restrictions have been examined in a variety of contexts. However, an examination of consumer reactance regarding participation in sport gaming activities, such as daily fantasy sport and sport gambling is non-existent. Two studies were developed using experimental designs to: (a) identify whether sport gaming participation intentions were influenced by government restrictions; (b) examine the influence of reactance tendencies on behavioral intentions; and (c) test whether consumer reactance moderates the relationship between government restrictions and gaming intentions. Our results showed significant differences in intentions based on government restrictions for both daily fantasy sport (DFS) and sport gambling participants. Mean intention scores were highest in the scenarios where the activities were legal, which is contrary to previous consumer reactance literature. However, varying state regulations may be playing a role, as individuals can participate in these activities in states where they are legal. Additionally, consumer reactance played a moderating role for groups that were discouraged or restricted from the activity. Consumers with high reactance tendencies reacted unfavorably to threats of freedom as anticipated, extending our knowledge of the impacts of consumer reactance within the sport gaming industry.
Suggested Citation
Stephen L. Shapiro & Joris Drayer & Brendan Dwyer, 2020.
"An examination of consumer reactance to daily fantasy sport and sport gambling regulatory restrictions,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 797-809, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:23:y:2020:i:5:p:797-809
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2020.02.006
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:23:y:2020:i:5:p:797-809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.