Author
Listed:
- Brendan Dwyer
- Mark A. Slavich
- Jennifer L. Gellock
Abstract
•This study explored sport fan superstition through a multi-stage quantitative approach.•The factors examined included personality, cognitive and behavioral aspects.•Study one validated a multidimensional model of sport fan superstition.•Study two tested the dimensionality of sport fan superstition through segmentation.•Superstitious behaviour was found to be the most influential factor.Uncertainty is a fundamental component of spectator sport fandom. While it may draw some fans to an event, it can be frustrating for others, as fans have little control over how preferred teams perform. As a means to cope with this unpleasant state, some sport fans perform superstitions or create rituals. Little is known, however, how such beliefs and behaviors impact the sport fan experience. In the current study, the authors explored sport fan superstition within the context of mediated team sport spectatorship through a multi-study quantitative approach. The results of Study 1 validated a multidimensional model of sport fan superstition, and superstitious behavior positively impacted in-game mood states for fans of winning and losing teams. In Study 2, the authors tested the dimensionality of sport fan superstition through segmentation and uncovered consumption differences and attribution differences for fans of winning and losing teams. Superstitious behavior was once again an influential factor, as those who behaved more superstitiously were more likely to attribute outcomes to external sources such as referees and fate.
Suggested Citation
Brendan Dwyer & Mark A. Slavich & Jennifer L. Gellock, 2018.
"A fan’s search for meaning: Testing the dimensionality of sport fan superstition,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 533-548, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:21:y:2018:i:5:p:533-548
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2017.12.001
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:21:y:2018:i:5:p:533-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.