IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v17y2014i1p8-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of public sports facilities by the disabled in England

Author

Listed:
  • Shia Ping Kung
  • Peter Taylor

Abstract

•Three most participated sports – swimming, using fitness equipment and keep fit.•Dominated by females, whites, 45+ year olds and NS-SEC 1&2.•More likely to own leisure card, participate regularly and in organised activities.•Females, 35 year olds and NS-SEC 3 are harder to please.•The industry weaknesses relate to cleanliness and water temperature in the pool.Disabled sports participants are a small proportion of sports participants at English public sports centres; but they are important to the social inclusion agenda. This paper aims to provide a detailed insight into the preferences and behaviour of disabled sports participants.It investigated whether there were statistical differences: first, between the disabled sports participants and the non-disabled sports participants in terms of (1) social demographics, (2) patterns of participation, (3) travel, (4) sports activities and (5) customer satisfaction; and second, between age, ethnic, socio-economic and gender groups of their subsamples, on (2), (4) and (5) again. Disability is defined as having any long term illness or health problem which limits a person's daily activities or the work that a person can do. The data collected through the National Benchmarking Service, for 458 sports centres from 2005 to 2011, revealed that about 9% of over 150,000 sports participants were disabled. Swimming, using fitness equipment and keep fit related exercises were the top three most frequently stated main sports activities by the disabled. It was also more likely for the disabled to participate in organised activities, own a leisure card and participate regularly when compared with the non-disabled participants. In addition, the disabled were also more likely than the non-disabled to travel to the centre by public transport, from home and travel a longer journey time. The industry weaknesses as identified by the disabled relate to physical evidence of the sports centres, particularly cleanliness attributes. Measures that can be taken to increase sports participation by the disabled include competent support at sports centres, promotions through discount schemes or leisure cards, and free transportation to sport centres in catchment areas with high proportions of disabled in their population.

Suggested Citation

  • Shia Ping Kung & Peter Taylor, 2014. "The use of public sports facilities by the disabled in England," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 8-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:8-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2013.08.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2013.08.009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2013.08.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Barbier & Barbara Evrard & Nadine Dermit-Richard, 2023. "Predictive Modelling of Sports Facility Use: A Model of Aquatic Centre Attendance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Mei-Jung Chen & Wen-Bin Lin & Shao-Wei Yeh & Mei-Yen Chen, 2021. "Constructing Sports Promotion Models for an Accessibility and Efficiency Analysis of City Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Qian Wang & Zhigao Zhang, 2017. "Examining social inequalities in urban public leisure spaces provision using principal component analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2409-2420, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:8-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.