IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v17y2014i1p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the motivation scale for disability sport consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Cottingham
  • Michael S. Carroll
  • Dennis Phillips
  • Kostas Karadakis
  • Brian T. Gearity
  • Dan Drane

Abstract

•Spectators of discussions with practitioners and an extensive literature review identified 12 possible motives related to spectatorship of wheelchair basketball.•EFA and CFA analyses identified 9 significant motives related to spectator attendance.•Spectators of wheelchair basketball are motivated by traditional factors (i.e. drama) as well as disability specific motives (inspiration) > inspiration and supercrip image are separate motives which influence attendance.While there is a growing body of knowledge on disability sport consumer behavior (Byon, Carroll, Cottingham, Grady, & Allen, 2011; Byon, Cottingham, & Carroll, 2010), these studies used scales explicitly designed for non-disability sport contexts, showing only reasonable model fit and not examining factors specific to the disability sport consumer experience. This publication represents the first attempt to identify specific disability sport motives and develop a scale, the Motivation Scale for Disability Sport Consumption (MSDSC). Newly identified disability sport motives include inspiration, supercrip image and disability cultural education. These were examined in conjunction with factors from Trail and James (2001) and Trail (2010). Data were collected at the 2011 collegiate wheelchair basketball championships; results were collected to conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results indicated that a 9-factor model was most appropriate. Significant motives included physical attraction, drama, escape, inspiration, physical skill, social interaction, violence, and supercrip image. The model fit was improved over the Byon studies and was comparable to relevant non-adaptive motive studies (Lee, Trail, & Anderson, 2009; Trail & James, 2001; Robinson, Trail, & Kwon, 2004). This scale represents a tool for practitioners and academics to effectively examine spectators of disability sport.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Cottingham & Michael S. Carroll & Dennis Phillips & Kostas Karadakis & Brian T. Gearity & Dan Drane, 2014. "Development and validation of the motivation scale for disability sport consumption," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 49-64, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:49-64
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2013.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2013.11.001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2013.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheila Matson-Barkat & Petya Puncheva-Michelotti & Clara Koetz & Sophie Hennekam, 2022. "Destigmatisation through social sharing of emotions and empowerment: The case of disabled athletes and consumers of disability sports," Post-Print hal-03699211, HAL.
    2. Matson-Barkat, Sheila & Puncheva-Michelotti, Petya & Koetz, Clara & Hennekam, Sophie, 2022. "Destigmatisation through social sharing of emotions and empowerment: The case of disabled athletes and consumers of disability sports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 77-84.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.