Author
Listed:
- Michael Hutchinson
- Gregg Bennett
Abstract
► Investigation of stakeholder attitudes toward athletic department behavioral congruency with university core values. ► Findings revealed perceived lack of congruency between athletic department behavior and institutional core values. ► Implications include the potential justification for separate academic and athletic brand images. ► Implications further propose an increase in core value advertisement and ownership for brand insulation.The purpose of this case study was to investigate stakeholder attitudes toward athletic department behavioral congruency with the stated core values of a major BCS1 university located in the Southwestern portion of the United States. Research has indicated that positive and negative attitudes toward intercollegiate athletics can contribute to the perceptions of congruency with the established university mission and values. Over time, however, the increase in negative attitudes attributed to athletic department behavior brings into question their congruency with the university core values. Document analysis and personal interviews (N = 13) were conducted with individuals from each of six university internal and external stakeholder groups. Findings revealed four primary themes: (a) Excellence Equals Winning, (b) For Public Relations Purposes Only, (c) Separation and Isolation of the Athletic Department, and (d) Lack of Leadership from the Top-Down. Implications and future research concerning university brand image and core value accountability are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Michael Hutchinson & Gregg Bennett, 2012.
"Core values brand building in sport: Stakeholder attitudes towards intercollegiate athletics and university brand congruency,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 434-447, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:434-447
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2012.02.001
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:434-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.