IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v47y2023i4p408-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective

Author

Listed:
  • J. Rudolph
  • D. J. Bradfield

Abstract

This paper responds to the recent (2022) change to Regulation 28 of the South African Pension Funds Act which now permits an increased allocation (raised from 30% to 45%) in foreign investments. Our primary aim is to establish a strategic (long-term) benchmark weight for the allocation to foreign assets. Our secondary aim is to assist in building intuition on potential tactical (shorter-term) foreign allocation decisions. To ensure rigour in our study, we use a novel dataset dating back to the 1930s and we utilise methodologies in recent academic literature in the mean-variance framework. Our optimisation evidence supports a strategic foreign benchmark allocation of 39% (with 61% allocated to local asset classes). We highlight that this strategic foreign benchmark of 39% (probably for the first time) enables managers to potentially take on meaningful tactical overweight foreign positions. We establish that this strategic foreign benchmark would have reduced the risk (standard deviation of returns) of the local-only optimal portfolio significantly from 10% p.a. down to 8.7% p.a. over the 92 year period analysed, whilst increasing the return by an additional 1.1% p.a. over the local-only portfolio. Lastly, we provide guidance on tactical foreign allocation decisions based on four potential local economic regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Rudolph & D. J. Bradfield, 2023. "Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 408-423, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:47:y:2023:i:4:p:408-423
    DOI: 10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:47:y:2023:i:4:p:408-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.