IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v47y2023i4p303-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place a bar on government size to bar growth reversal: fresh evidence from BARS curve hypothesis in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Adeyemi Afolabi

Abstract

The theoretical and empirical links between optimum government size and economic growth have been widely debated in the economic literature, with the Barro-Armey-Rahn-Scully (BARS) curve positing a nonlinear nexus between the two variables. However, empirical evidence on the nonlinearity of the government size-economic growth nexus and the growth-maximizing government size, with specific focus on Sub-Saharan Africa, is scarce. This paper, therefore, tests the validity of the BARS curve and investigates the optimum government size needed to avert growth reversal across Sub-Saharan African income groups. The panel quantile regression model was adopted to estimate relevant data covering 2000–2020 obtained from reputable international databases. The results showed mixed findings but validated the postulation of the BARS curve in low-income and lower-middle income countries. The results are sensitive to the choice of government size indicator and vary across quantiles and income groups. In sum, the results showed that government size must be barred to a certain threshold to avert growth reversal. Therefore, fiscal policy instruments should be used circumspectly to ensure sustainable economic growth across Sub-Saharan African countries, irrespective of their income group.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Adeyemi Afolabi, 2023. "Place a bar on government size to bar growth reversal: fresh evidence from BARS curve hypothesis in Sub-Saharan Africa," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 303-320, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:47:y:2023:i:4:p:303-320
    DOI: 10.1080/03796205.2023.2220079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03796205.2023.2220079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03796205.2023.2220079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:47:y:2023:i:4:p:303-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.