Author
Abstract
In this paper the efficiency of the stock index futures market and the underlying spot market is investigated over the period January 2, 1996 to June 29, 2001. In addition to examining the whole data set, the sample was also divided into four subsamples, each of which was analysed independently. The four subsamples included a pre-crisis or tranquil period, a crisis period, a transition period and, finally, a post-crisis period. The crisis period spans the time of the Asian financial crisis whereas the transition period incorporates two events which may have impacted on market efficiency - the Russian ruble crisis and the South African rand crisis. We tested for unit roots, market cointegration and Granger causality with vector error correction and found that the two markets were relatively inefficient during the pre-crisis period but that efficiency improved following the onset of the crisis. The futures market proved to be the dominant market in the long-run during all four subsample periods since it was primarily responsible for maintaining its equilibrium relationship with the underlying spot market. Over the short-term, the futures return was found to lead or Granger-cause the spot return during the pre-crisis period, but this was reversed during the crisis period. No short-term causality relationship could be detected for the transition and post-crisis periods. Futures prices are expected to lead spot prices because of lower transaction costs and less restrictive short-selling in the futures market. We speculate that the anomaly, i.e., the spot price lead, during the crisis period reflect investor behaviour during times of uncertainty and distress when more value is attached to the underlying asset than to past performance or future prospects of the derivative instrument.
Suggested Citation
H M J Leng, 2002.
"The South African Share Index Futures and Share Markets : Efficiency and Causality Revisited,"
Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:1-18
DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2002.12106334
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.