Author
Listed:
- Aisa Tri Agustini
- Jogiyanto Hartono Mustakini
Abstract
PurposeThis research aims to review the integration of blockchain in accounting issues by identifying patterns and areas of research and outlining a roadmap for future investigations.MotivationAlthough anecdotal evidence indicates a rising investment in blockchain technology, there is currently a lack of systematic literature reviews assessing its implications in accounting issues. While blockchain holds significant potential, the challenges and opportunities associated with its integration into financial reporting warrant further investigation.Design/Methodology/ApproachFrom 2017 to 2023, a systematic literature review in the accounting, business, and management journals from the Scopus Database identified 77 articles on blockchain and accounting.Main findingsIncreasing the quality of information using blockchain positively impacts governance, accountability, supply chain, innovation, shareholder value, and sustainability reporting. However, stakeholders' high expectations of these benefits, coupled with a minimal understanding of blockchain and the need for accounting regulations or standards governing blockchain adoption, may reduce the reliability and relevance of information derived from blockchain adoption, potentially leading to opportunistic behaviour.Practical implicationsOrganizations must manage risks amidst high expectations(hype) surrounding the adoption of this technology. Further research into earnings management – whether opportunistic or beneficial – and its impact on non-profits and SMEs could yield valuable insights.Novelty/ContributionProvides a comprehensive overview of current accounting research on blockchain technology through a hybrid approach.
Suggested Citation
Aisa Tri Agustini & Jogiyanto Hartono Mustakini, 2025.
"A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and accounting issues: Is it a hype or hope?,"
South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 73-107, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:73-107
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2024.2371616
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:73-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.