IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v38y2024i3p247-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Filling the fiscal basket: Quantifying tax revenues from customer loyalty programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Ilanri Croucamp
  • Jade Craigen
  • Teresa Pidduck
  • Sumarie Swanepoel
  • Elizabeth Coetzee

Abstract

The South African government is experiencing a significant shortfall in tax revenue, and recent research has identified customer loyalty programmes (CLPs) as a potential revenue stream. Despite the popularity of these programmes, which are used by 73% of economically active South Africans, no tax is currently imposed on the rewards received by customers, resulting in the loss of much-needed tax revenue. This paper quantifies the tax revenue that could have been generated by South Africa’s three most-used CLPs over a five-year period (2018–2022) to determine if a tax on CLP rewards is a viable revenue stream for the fiscus. The longitudinal instrumental case study employed demonstrates that the fiscus could have conservatively collected R1 140 753 042 in total tax revenue from the three CLPs if a tax had been imposed on CLP rewards, as proposed in this paper. This paper highlights the significant revenue potential of taxing CLP rewards, and it provides valuable insights for policymakers who seek to address the country’s revenue challenges. The findings reveal the magnitude of potential contributions to tax revenue in the form of CLPs. Given the impetus behind CLPs, their exponential growth rate and their increasing importance as a marketing strategy, this paper proposes a re-evaluation by policymakers of the taxation of CLP rewards.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilanri Croucamp & Jade Craigen & Teresa Pidduck & Sumarie Swanepoel & Elizabeth Coetzee, 2024. "Filling the fiscal basket: Quantifying tax revenues from customer loyalty programmes," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 247-263, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:38:y:2024:i:3:p:247-263
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2024.2322783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2024.2322783
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2024.2322783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:38:y:2024:i:3:p:247-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.