Author
Listed:
- Nana Adwoa Anokye Effah
- Agyeiwaa Owusu Nkwantabisa
Abstract
An essential component of every university’s desired outcome is producing successful students with advanced academic and cognitive learning skills. However, this goal might be compromised and, in some extreme cases, not attained due to circumstances encountered in the university education process. In an attempt to determine some of the factors that affect academic performance in the university amid the ever-increasing needs of students, this study ascertains the academic engagement levels of university accounting students in Ghana and the relationship between academic engagement (Vigour, Dedication and Absorption) and academic performance measured by students’ perceived academic performance and Grade Point Average (GPA). Utilising a quantitative research approach with questionnaires as the primary research instrument, data were collected from 215 university students and analysed using a hierarchical regression technique. The analyses showed that accounting students score high on Dedication rather than Vigour and Absorption in terms of academic engagement. Additionally, results indicated that older accounting students academically perform better than their younger counterparts. Furthermore, academic engagement was found to affect students’ academic performance but with much emphasis on students’ Dedication to studying accounting. The study’s findings in consonance with the student involvement theory assert that amid the claim that the accounting programme is challenging for most students, students’ performance can be improved. This is achievable if students intently develop the drive to study in addition to the efforts of educators to improve accounting education.
Suggested Citation
Nana Adwoa Anokye Effah & Agyeiwaa Owusu Nkwantabisa, 2022.
"The influence of academic engagement on academic performance of university accounting students in Ghana,"
South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 105-122, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:36:y:2022:i:2:p:105-122
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2021.1988204
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:36:y:2022:i:2:p:105-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.