Author
Listed:
- Marese Lombard
- Alta Koekemoer
Abstract
The World Health Organization has urged countries to implement a sin tax on items containing high levels of sugar to address the current worldwide obesity epidemic. Consequently, sugar taxes have become increasingly popular. However, many sugar tax systems are implemented without considering whether these systems are appropriate in addressing the obesity problem or are sustainable in the long run. In order for a tax system to be sustainable, it has to be compliant with the principles of a good tax system. These principles, however, are general in nature and have not been adapted for a sugar tax system. This article shows the modification of general principles of a good tax system to be specifically applicable to that of a sugar tax system. The modified tax principles can be applied to determine whether a sugar tax system is the appropriate tool to address obesity as well as its sustainability in future. A conceptual framework is established by using chain of referral sampling in order to identify modern tax principles. These principles are adapted to fit a sugar tax system by determining the influence of various sugar tax system design types on these principles. The conceptual framework provides guidelines to legislators regarding the development of such a system depending on the importance of each principle. Since the principles are sometimes oppositional in nature, trade-offs between the principles are inevitable. The framework does, however, provide guidance as to what could possibly be regarded as a highly acceptable option.
Suggested Citation
Marese Lombard & Alta Koekemoer, 2020.
"Conceptual framework for the evaluation of sugar tax systems,"
South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 63-90, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:63-90
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2019.1667637
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:63-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.