Author
Listed:
- Rolien Kunz
- Herman de Jager
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to determine the relative size of the expectation-performance gap of technical auditing and assurance knowledge of newly employed first-year trainee accountants. In a study dealing with the expectation-performance gap in accounting education it was reported that according to practitioners, graduates were not able to demonstrate the expected practical accounting knowledge. This gives rise to the question: is the gap really as big as practitioners would like academic institutions to believe? As the relative extent of the gap will be determined in this study, the findings could assist audit and assurance academics in understanding accounting practitioners’ expectations of and concerns about newly employed first-year trainee accountants, which as a result could be addressed in their education practices. In addition, training at training offices at audit firms could be customised to focus on the areas in which the newly employed first-year trainee accountants are lacking.A questionnaire was used to determine audit managers’ perceptions regarding their expectations and their perceptions regarding the actual levels of capability demonstrated by newly employed first-year trainee accountants when performing technical audit and assurance tasks, after which the relative size of the expectation-performance gap was determined. The findings indicate that audit managers do not expect newly employed first-year trainee accountants to be capable of performing any of the identified technical audit and assurance tasks without, or with only limited supervision. However, despite this rather low expectation, it was evident that newly employed first-year trainee accountants do not meet audit managers’ expectations. The technical audit and assurance task with the largest expectation-performance gap was the ability of newly employed first-year trainee accountants to consider and document the need to use computer-assisted audit techniques to gather audit evidence, with an expectation-performance gap of 28.9%.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:145-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.