Author
Abstract
In this study taxation students’ perceptions of open-book assessment, prior to their exposure to open-book assessment in the qualifying examination of South African chartered accountants, is explored. A focus group was conducted using the Interactive Qualitative Analysis methodology. In this focus group, taxation students without prior exposure to open-book assessment identified their perception themes (also referred to as affinities) on open-book assessment. These affinities were grouped together and described by them as: good preparation, back-up, encouragement, general advantages, improved quality of answers, negative symptoms, negative environment, personal experience and hindrance, different approach and time management. The students then identified relationships between these different affinities. These relationships were summarized and reflected on a System Interrelationship Diagram, giving a visual map of the students’ perceptions.Findings from the System Interrelationship Diagram indicated that students perceive good preparation as the strongest driver for successful completion of an open-book assessment. This System Interrelationship Diagram showed three primary outcomes namely negative symptoms, different approach and time management. This implies that students perceived that open-book assessment may create laziness (negative symptom) in students leading to a different approach when preparing for and completing such assessments. Finally, they concluded that successful completion of an open-book assessment necessitates proper time management.
Suggested Citation
H du Preez & C S du Preez, 2012.
"Taxation students’ perceptions of open-book assessment prior to the qualifying examination of South African chartered accountants,"
South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 119-142, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:119-142
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2012.11435166
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:119-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.