IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v30y2023i6p2257-2284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who votes for free trade and when? Geopolitics as the source of legislative preferences on free trade agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Eun Kim
  • Joonseok Yang

Abstract

Why do legislators support some free trade agreements but oppose others? Despite a wide variation in legislative support for free trade agreements, the heterogeneous preferences of legislators have received little attention in the literature, which largely focuses on general trade policy preferences of legislators and individual voters. We bring in geopolitical factors as a key source of legislative preferences on specific free trade agreements. Using voting records of the U.S. House representatives on all major bills related to free trade agreements, we find that the geostrategic importance of potential trading partner has a substantial effect on voting for trade agreements. We find that legislators become less sensitive to their constituents’ economic interests when considering trade agreements with allies or countries with closely aligned interests. This highlights the importance of examining security externalities of trade cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Eun Kim & Joonseok Yang, 2023. "Who votes for free trade and when? Geopolitics as the source of legislative preferences on free trade agreements," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 2257-2284, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:2257-2284
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2022.2144927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2022.2144927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2022.2144927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:2257-2284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.