IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v28y2021i3p690-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The past and present of abolition: reassessing Adam Smith’s “liberal reward of labor”

Author

Listed:
  • Robbie Shilliam

Abstract

Abolish prisons; abolish police; abolish immigration enforcement: current “abolition” movements have yet to receive the attention that international political economy has given to its social justice forerunners, e.g. World Social Forum and Occupy. I argue that to make the current abolition movement legible to the field first requires a retrieval of abolition’s import for classical political economy. Towards this aim, I reassess the ways in which Adam Smith’s ethical prospecting of the “liberal reward of labor” referenced abolition. I then contextualize Smith’s agonistic argument for commercial society within late seventeenth to early nineteenth century struggles over imperial commerce, especially Atlantic slavery. For this purpose, I take a prompt from the institutional framework of “abolition democracy” provided by Angela Davis and WEB Du Bois. Specifically, I examine the ways in which the prospect of abolition challenged a) existing institutions that rendered enslaved labor in plantation economies as property; as well as b) the patriarchal institutions in England that rendered labor through a “master/servant” relation. I conclude by arguing that current abolition movements prompt us to address the obfuscation in classical political economy of particular agents and sites through which struggles over freedom have been waged across capital’s imperium.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbie Shilliam, 2021. "The past and present of abolition: reassessing Adam Smith’s “liberal reward of labor”," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 690-711, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:690-711
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1741425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2020.1741425
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2020.1741425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:690-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.