IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v25y2018i1p122-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Periodizing, paths and probabilities: why critical junctures and path dependence produce causal confusion

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Peinert

Abstract

This review examines four recent works in political economy seeking to make sense of the political and economic changes of the 1970s. This recent wave of work increasingly sees these institutional changes as the result of forces endogenous to the political and economic institutions of the post-war era, but it also continues to make use of the common practice of seeing history as an alternation between deterministic path dependence and contingent critical junctures. This review argues that when applied to these and similar endogenous arguments, the approach of path dependence and critical junctures is unable to empirically distinguish between deterministic and contingent processes, despite being conceptually predicated on the distinction between the two. This argument is demonstrated by showing that these arguments about the transformations of the 1970s can be flipped between deterministic and contingent explanations based on nearly the same empirical evidence. The review then addresses the recent development of ‘gradualist’ mechanisms of institutional change, like drift, layering, and conversion, to show that they do not resolve this difficulty. The review concludes by proposing a research agenda based on an alternative empirical approach specifically tailored to understanding endogenous institutional change.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Peinert, 2018. "Periodizing, paths and probabilities: why critical junctures and path dependence produce causal confusion," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 122-143, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:25:y:2018:i:1:p:122-143
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1387586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2017.1387586
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2017.1387586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:25:y:2018:i:1:p:122-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.