IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v23y2016i3p511-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coercion in international tax cooperation: identifying the prerequisites for sanction threats by a great power

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Hakelberg

Abstract

Tax cooperation puts offshore centers worse off, as their compensation for forgone profits is a hard political sell, and unlikely to produce the same spillover effects on wages and employment as the attraction of foreign tax base. Coercion by a great power thus seems to be a prerequisite for successful international cooperation in tax matters. Great power status is based on internal market size. Governments become substantially more likely to use this power through sanction threats against tax havens when two factors coincide: (1) domestic constraints preventing a shift of the tax burden to labor and consumption and (2) scope for redistributive cooperation benefitting great power banks or multinationals. Hypotheses are tested in an analysis of tax negotiations at OECD level between 1996 and 2014.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Hakelberg, 2016. "Coercion in international tax cooperation: identifying the prerequisites for sanction threats by a great power," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 511-541, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:511-541
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1127269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2015.1127269
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2015.1127269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joana Andrade Vicente, . "Arguments for implementing formulary apportionment in the European Union," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    2. Panagiotis Delimatsis & Bernard Hoekman, 2017. "National Tax Regulation, International Standards and the GATS: Argentina—Financial Services," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/42, European University Institute.
    3. Lukas Hakelberg & Max Schaub, 2018. "The redistributive impact of hypocrisy in international taxation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 353-370, September.
    4. Lips, Wouter, 2019. "The EU Commission’s Digital Tax Proposals and its Cross-platform Impact in the EU and the OECD," SocArXiv k2t9j, Center for Open Science.
    5. Joana Andrade Vicente, 2021. "Tax us, if you can: a game theoretic approach to profit shifting within the European Union," Working Papers REM 2021/0206, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    6. Hearson, Martin, 2018. "Transnational expertise and the expansion of the international tax regime: imposing ‘acceptable’ standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88351, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Fatemi, Darius & Kim, Jang-Chul, 2024. "Information asymmetry in non-US stocks: The compounding and mitigating effects of tax havens and corruption," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Sheila Killian & Philip O'Regan & Ruth Lynch & Martin Laheen & Dionysios Karavidas, 2022. "Regulating havens: The role of hard and soft governance of tax experts in conditions of secrecy and low regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 722-737, July.
    9. Lips, Wouter, 2018. "Great powers in global tax governance: a comparison of the US role in the CRS and BEPS," SocArXiv ewd3j, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:511-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.