IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v17y2016i1p93-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Trapenberg Frick

Abstract

Scholarship on citizen activism in a digital era is growing exponentially in sociology, political science, and communications/new media studies. Theorists observe changing dynamics and power shifts within a public virtual sphere. In contrast, planning scholarship is sparse on how citizens use technology outside of official channels to participate and mobilize. To explore this under-studied phenomenon, a new conceptual framework is developed by synthesizing literature across disciplines to examine digital networked activism in planning and focusing on conservative activists’ fierce opposition to regional planning in Atlanta, Georgia and the San Francisco Bay Area. I find activists use new media in combination with traditional strategies to communicate, organize, market their cause and refine tactics. The new media facilitates their channeling of deeply held emotions into the production, performance and circulation of counter-narratives that destabilize the planning process as conventionally understood. Planners’ responses are largely reactive and catching up to the challenge. As a result, planners I interviewed are rethinking civic engagement in a digital era.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2016. "Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 93-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:93-118
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1125520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2015.1125520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2015.1125520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2017. "Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 133-136.
    2. Cassidy I-Chih Lan & Li-Pei Peng, 2018. "E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:93-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.