IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i1p38-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative analysis of the experiences of people with psychosis of a novel cognitive behavioural therapy targeting suicidality

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne F. Awenat
  • Emma Shaw-Núñez
  • James Kelly
  • Heather Law
  • Sehar Ahmed
  • Mary Welford
  • Nicholas Tarrier
  • Patricia A. Gooding

Abstract

This study presents a qualitative evaluation of a novel cognitive behavioural therapy targeting suicidal thoughts and behaviours for people experiencing psychosis. Eight participants from four NHS Trusts in the northwest of England were interviewed. The interview schedule was collaboratively developed with a Service User Reference Group whose membership included people with experience of psychosis. Thematic analysis captured participants’ experiences of recovery from suicidal thoughts and behaviours following therapy. Two themes were identified: “Acceptability” depicted participants’ views about the process of therapy and the therapeutic relationship; “In-recovery from suicidality” illustrated participants’ views of the impact of the therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne F. Awenat & Emma Shaw-Núñez & James Kelly & Heather Law & Sehar Ahmed & Mary Welford & Nicholas Tarrier & Patricia A. Gooding, 2017. "A qualitative analysis of the experiences of people with psychosis of a novel cognitive behavioural therapy targeting suicidality," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 38-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:38-47
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2016.1198827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2016.1198827
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2016.1198827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:38-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.