Author
Listed:
- Lisa Wood
- Eilish Burke
- Rory Byrne
- Melissa Pyle
- Nicola Chapman
- Anthony Morrison
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the qualitative literature to understand stigma from a service-user perspective.Method: A thematic synthesis of nine studies examining service-users’ experiences of stigma was conducted. Studies were included if they used a qualitative methodology to examine experiences of stigma as a primary research question with participants who have personal experience of psychosis.Results: Two overarching themes were identified; the stigma system and stigma processes. The stigma system highlighted the multi-layered social system which can cause and maintain stigma. Five sub-circles of the stigma system were detailed including the individual, family, friends, community and society. Stigma processes are the mechanisms which contribute to the development of stigma and to how it can be overcome. Eight sub-themes of stigma processes were included broadly pertaining to acceptance, kindness, communication, education and understanding within all areas of the individuals’ social system.Conclusion: Stigma is embedded in the individual’s social system and involves a number of distinct processes. While individualised interventions may be effective in preventing or alleviating the internalisation of stigma, it is clear that wider systemic or societal interventions are also required.
Suggested Citation
Lisa Wood & Eilish Burke & Rory Byrne & Melissa Pyle & Nicola Chapman & Anthony Morrison, 2015.
"Stigma in psychosis: A thematic synthesis of current qualitative evidence,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 152-165, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:152-165
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2014.926561
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:152-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.