IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v6y2014i4p297-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intra-staff openness; “What’s a nice girl like you doing in a place like this?”

Author

Listed:
  • Ann-Louise S. Silver

Abstract

At the 1986 Chestnut Lodge Symposium, Diane LaVia read a presentation written by a group of five female members of the Chestnut Lodge medical staff, reporting on our study group, which had been meeting for the prior three years. The membership included Drs. Lea Goldberg, Diane LaVia, Laurice McAfee, Vega Zagier, and myself. Like many of the symposium presentations, it was not published. The presentation conveyed the importance of staff members learning aspects of each other’s histories. I believe that the notion of the “blank screen” has been perversely used to maintain our own schizoid defenses: “It’s nobody’s business but my analyst’s” serves to keep us as strangers from the others with whom we may work side by side for years or decades. If we only learn about our colleagues at their funerals, we are left with the poignancy of lost opportunity. This opportunity probably has clinical implications as well as interpersonal, as patients observe our interactions with our peers. With their heightened acuity regarding trustworthiness, they take the measure of our own defensiveness, our own hyper-reliance on a professional veneer.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann-Louise S. Silver, 2014. "Intra-staff openness; “What’s a nice girl like you doing in a place like this?”," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 297-305, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:297-305
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2014.970224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2014.970224
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2014.970224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:297-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.