IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v17y2025i1p69-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from therapists about the challenges and opportunities of training in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: qualitative findings from a US-based service evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Helen J. Wood
  • Christina Babusci
  • Kate V. Hardy
  • Kristyn Maikranz
  • Deepak K. Sarpal
  • Jessica M. Gannon

Abstract

BackgroundCBT for psychosis (CBTp) is a care standard for people with psychosis in the United States (US). However, CBTp access is poor. The context differs from the UK, where CBTp was primarily developed. This US-based service evaluation addresses a knowledge gap and forms a pilot study: a broad goal was to learn about CBTp training’s impact on therapists. Specific aims were to: 1) describe the challenges and opportunities of CBTp training by interviewing therapists competent in formulation-driven CBTp; 2) make recommendations for practice and research.MethodsTherapists’ experiences of a 3-day CBTp workshop and 12-month consultation period in a US outpatient service were evaluated via focus groups. Participants were eight of ten therapists achieving CBTp competency.ResultsThematic analysis of focus group content yielded four themes: 1) Before CBTp: Support and medication; 2) Hope and possibility; 3) A reality check; 4) The future: Ongoing development or “flavor of the week”.DiscussionTherapist perspectives help elucidate barriers and facilitators for US CBTp implementation, from the challenge for therapist-case managers of accommodating CBTp, to the potential of shared therapeutic models for team cohesion. Recommendations include clarifying how best to use CBTp within large caseloads, and mixed method longitudinal studies of training.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen J. Wood & Christina Babusci & Kate V. Hardy & Kristyn Maikranz & Deepak K. Sarpal & Jessica M. Gannon, 2025. "Learning from therapists about the challenges and opportunities of training in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: qualitative findings from a US-based service evaluation," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 69-81, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:69-81
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2024.2386615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2024.2386615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2024.2386615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:69-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.