IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v16y2024i4p425-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review exploring challenges of informed consent processes in antipsychotic prescribing

Author

Listed:
  • Jemima Thompson
  • Lisa M. Grünwald

Abstract

IntroductionInformed consent is the process whereby individuals make decisions about their medical care. Information provision, presumption of capability and absence of coercion are three fundamental assumptions required to provide informed consent. Informed consent may be complex to achieve in the context of antipsychotic prescribing. This systematic review aimed to explore challenges relating to informed consent processes in antipsychotic prescribing in the UK.MethodThis was a systematic review of the literature relating to informed consent in antipsychotic prescribing in community settings. Data were analysed using Framework analysis.ResultsTwenty-eight articles were included. Information provision has been perceived as lacking for a long time. Capacity has often not been assumed and loss of capacity has sometimes been viewed as permanent. Power imbalances associated with prescriber status and legal framework surrounding the Mental Health Act can blur lines between coercion and persuasion.DiscussionChallenges relating to process of informed consent in antipsychotic prescribing have persisted throughout the last few decades. People prescribed antipsychotics need to be made aware of their effects in line with current research. Further research is required to develop models for best practices for informed consent.

Suggested Citation

  • Jemima Thompson & Lisa M. Grünwald, 2024. "A systematic review exploring challenges of informed consent processes in antipsychotic prescribing," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 425-438, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:425-438
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2023.2285967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2023.2285967
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2023.2285967?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:425-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.