IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v16y2024i4p339-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Loizou
  • David Fowler
  • Mark Hayward

Abstract

BackgroundThe outcomes of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for distressing voices and their measurement have mostly been determined by professionals, with little focus on the outcomes that matter to people who hear voices. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore views about the outcomes of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for distressing voices from the perspectives of lived and professional experience.MethodsFifteen service users and fourteen practitioners were recruited from mental health services. Semi-structured interview schedules were used to guide individual interviews with service users and focus groups with practitioners. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied to generate themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: “I want what I can’t have”, “Feeling empowered”, “Understanding and managing my emotions”, and “Doing more of what I want to do”. Two themes contained sub-themes.DiscussionValued outcomes by service users and practitioners appeared to reflect changes in voice characteristics, improvements in self-confidence and self-respect, acceptance of voices, understanding and managing emotions and personal outcomes. Findings suggest discrepancies between service users’ and practitioners’ priorities in regard to changes in voice characteristics and understanding and managing negative emotions. Recommendations include a greater focus on managing emotions by practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Loizou & David Fowler & Mark Hayward, 2024. "Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 339-351, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:339-351
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2023.2269225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2023.2269225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2023.2269225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:339-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.