Author
Listed:
- Vanesa Peinado
- Carmen Valiente
- Regina Espinosa
- Almudena Trucharte
- Alba Contreras
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the widespread acceptance of the concept of jumping to conclusions (JTC), recent studies have found no relationship between paranoia and draws to decision (DTD), while results regarding the stimuli salience are contradictory. Additionally, JTC and overconfidence bias are generally encountered together. This study aims to 1) analyse the effect of stimuli salience on JTC and decision confidence, 2) examine the JTC presence and its association with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and 3) explore the relationship between symptomatology, specifically paranoia, DTD, decision confidence, and Theory of Mind (ToM).MethodsOne hundred and thirty-six individuals (Mage 43.21) diagnosed with Severe Psychiatric Conditions (SPC; Schizophrenia, Affective, and Personality disorders) performed two digitised probabilistic tasks with neutral and salient stimuli, measuring decision confidence, and completed the Symptom Checklist 90-R and the Eyes test.ResultsSalience had no significant effect on DTD or decision confidence. 40.4% of participants presented JTC bias, and schizophrenia diagnosis was not a predictor of it. Paranoia was associated with decision confidence but not with DTD or ToM, while DTD was related to ToM.DiscussionFindings highlight that JTC and response confidence are valuable targets in treating SPC. Implications for future research on the relevance of the JTC measuring method are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Vanesa Peinado & Carmen Valiente & Regina Espinosa & Almudena Trucharte & Alba Contreras, 2024.
"Decision confidence, but not jumping to conclusions bias, is related to paranoia. A study with individuals with severe psychiatric conditions,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 261-272, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:261-272
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2023.2234449
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:261-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.