IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v16y2024i2p118-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissociation mediates association between childhood trauma and distress from trauma research participation: analysis of pooled clinical data

Author

Listed:
  • Dongjoo Kim
  • Daeho Kim
  • Eun Kyoung Kim

Abstract

BackgroundChildhood trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are risk factors for emotional distress from trauma-related research participation. The role of dissociation, however, has not been investigated. This study examined the mediation effect of dissociation and PTSD on the relationship between childhood trauma and distress in trauma studies.MethodsPooled data of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Impact of Events Scale-Revised, Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon, and Trauma Antecedents Questionnaire from 231 psychiatric patients (73% diagnosed with psychotic illnesses) at a psychiatric clinic in South Korea were analysed. We performed multiple mediation effect analysis to verify a structural model for distress in trauma-related questionnaires.ResultsThirteen percent of participants reported distress after the survey. In the structural equation, the symptoms of PTSD did not show a significant relationship (p = .064). When the two parameters were included in the model, it was found that the direct effect of childhood trauma on distress was not significant (p = .43), but dissociation showed a direct effect on distress (p

Suggested Citation

  • Dongjoo Kim & Daeho Kim & Eun Kyoung Kim, 2024. "Dissociation mediates association between childhood trauma and distress from trauma research participation: analysis of pooled clinical data," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 118-130, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:118-130
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2023.2176536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2023.2176536
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2023.2176536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:118-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.