Author
Listed:
- Shayden Bryce
- Ashleigh de Winter
- Lisa Phillips
- Nicholas Cheng
- Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
- Kelly Allott
Abstract
BackgroundIdentifying cognitive strengths may be one avenue for enhancing functional recovery in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study explored the perspectives of young people with FEP on the conceptualisation of cognitive strengths and the perceived risks and benefits, and pragmatic considerations, of a cognitive strengths-based approach to assessment and treatment.MethodsTen participants, aged 18 to 26 (Mage = 21.44 years, SD = 2.70), were recruited from an early psychosis assessment and treatment service. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsFour overarching themes emerged, related to: 1) Understanding cognitive strengths in FEP; 2) Potential benefits; 3) Barriers and risks; and 4) Considerations for development and implementation. Young people held positive views toward assessment and treatment methods focused on cognitive strengths, suggesting that identifying strengths and building confidence beliefs may promote greater functioning. Potential barriers, including harms related to being unable to identify cognitive strengths or neglecting deficits, were areas requiring further consideration.DiscussionA cognitive strengths-based approach to assessment and treatment in FEP is a promising area of investigation, according to young people with FEP. The results provide insight regarding a cognitive strengths definition and the ways that these could be measured in future.
Suggested Citation
Shayden Bryce & Ashleigh de Winter & Lisa Phillips & Nicholas Cheng & Mario Alvarez-Jimenez & Kelly Allott, 2023.
"Cognitive strengths in first-episode psychosis: perspectives from young people with lived experience,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 240-251, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:240-251
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2022.2044895
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:240-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.