Author
Listed:
- Eleanor Longden
- Dirk Corstens
- Melissa Pyle
- Richard Emsley
- Sarah Peters
- Nisha Chauhan
- Nikki Dehmahdi
- Anthony P. Morrison
Abstract
Aims: The Talking With Voices pilot trial assesses feasibility and acceptability of a novel dialogical intervention to ameliorate distress associated with auditory hallucinations. The results will inform a definitive randomised trial to assess clinical and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.Method: The trial is single-site with a single-blind (rater) design in which adult participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder are randomised to receive either treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU plus up to 26 sessions of Talking With Voices therapy over six months. Participants are assessed at baseline and again at six-month follow-up. The primary outcomes are quantitative and qualitative assessments of feasibility and acceptability amongst patients and healthcare staff. Secondary outcomes will involve clinical measures, including targeted instruments for voice hearing, dissociation, and emotional distress.Results: Recruitment figures and baseline characteristics of the sample are reported (N=50).Conclusions: The Talking With Voices pilot trial aims to extend the evidence-base for interventions which use techniques such as dialogue, formulation and trauma-informed working to improve relationships between hearer and voice. Current findings demonstrate that recruitment and treatment allocation targets were met. If shown to be acceptable, the intervention may provide new therapeutic options for voice hearers with a diagnosis of psychosis.
Suggested Citation
Eleanor Longden & Dirk Corstens & Melissa Pyle & Richard Emsley & Sarah Peters & Nisha Chauhan & Nikki Dehmahdi & Anthony P. Morrison, 2021.
"Engaging dialogically with auditory hallucinations: design, rationale and baseline sample characteristics of the Talking With Voices pilot trial,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 315-326, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:315-326
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2021.1884740
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:315-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.