Author
Listed:
- Emilia Kramarz
- Sophie Lyles
- Helen L. Fisher
- Simon Riches
Abstract
BackgroundResearch indicates that clinical staff lack confidence in delivering clinical care for voice hearers. Understanding staff experience is therefore likely to benefit staff training.ObjectiveTo explore staff experience of delivering clinical care for voice hearers using qualitative methodology.MethodA total of 18 multidisciplinary staff from five acute psychiatric wards participated in brief semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsSix themes were identified. Participants reported Challenges of Understanding Subjective Experience (N = 16) of hearing voices, Empathy for Distress (N = 14) caused by voices, Curiosity about Experience (N = 10) and wish to understand, Anxiety about Clinical Risk (N = 8), especially regarding command hallucinations, Lack of Clinical Confidence (N = 7) in how to respond, and Diversity of Voices (N = 6) experienced by voice hearers.ConclusionStaff have empathy for voice hearers’ distress but feel they lack subjective understanding of what it feels like to hear voices. Lack of understanding, perceived clinical risks, and diversity of voices may be associated with reported lack of clinical confidence. Staff training that promotes greater subjective understanding has the potential to improve therapeutic relationships, clinical confidence, and quality of care. Using simulation technologies and involving people with lived experience in staff training may be ways to improve subjective understanding.
Suggested Citation
Emilia Kramarz & Sophie Lyles & Helen L. Fisher & Simon Riches, 2021.
"Staff experience of delivering clinical care on acute psychiatric wards for service users who hear voices: a qualitative study,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 58-64, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:58-64
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1781234
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.