IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i4p303-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors associated with general and specific dimensions of psychosis in a nationally representative sample of adults from the United States

Author

Listed:
  • David Murphy
  • Frédérique Vallières
  • Jamie Murphy
  • Eoin McElroy
  • Philip Hyland

Abstract

General and specific dimensions of psychosis have been identified in both clinical and general population samples. Demographic and clinical correlates, however, have only been explored within models derived from clinical data. Data were drawn from Wave 3 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (N = 36,309). Confirmatory factor analysis and confirmatory bifactor modelling were used to determine the optimal measurement model of psychosis symptoms among this sample. Structural equation modelling was used to identify variables correlated with the different psychosis dimensions, as per the best fitting measurement model. Measurement modelling results indicated that the latent structure of psychosis was best represented by a bifactor model including a general dimension orthogonal to four specific dimensions representing “Positive”, “Negative”, “Mania”, and “Disorganized” symptoms. Childhood interpersonal trauma, lack of social support, lower socio-economic status and suicidal attempts were associated with higher scores on the general dimension. These results provide further support for the validity of a bifactor model of psychosis in the general population and identify unique risk correlates of specific and general factors of psychosis.

Suggested Citation

  • David Murphy & Frédérique Vallières & Jamie Murphy & Eoin McElroy & Philip Hyland, 2020. "Risk factors associated with general and specific dimensions of psychosis in a nationally representative sample of adults from the United States," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 303-313, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:303-313
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1791238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2020.1791238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2020.1791238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:303-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.