IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v11y2019i3p273-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of ethnicity in involuntary psychiatric admission in Toronto, Canada in clients presenting with psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Rotenberg
  • Andrew Tuck
  • Kwame McKenzie

Abstract

In the UK, clients from black and minority ethnic groups experience higher rates of involuntary admission. In Canada, despite increasing immigration and diversity, this issue has not been a research focus. This retrospective study examined whether odds of admission, specifically involuntary admission, differed in a sample of 765 clients presenting with psychosis from six different ethnic groups. It was hypothesized that South and East Asian clients would be more likely to be admitted involuntarily. Logistic regression models were constructed from data that is routinely collected on clients who were admitted to hospital. The hypothesis was not supported and ethnicity did not predict admission. Future research should utilize administrative data and focus on equitable access to services in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Rotenberg & Andrew Tuck & Kwame McKenzie, 2019. "The role of ethnicity in involuntary psychiatric admission in Toronto, Canada in clients presenting with psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 273-276, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:273-276
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1612461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1612461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1612461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:273-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.