IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v11y2019i2p178-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power of psychiatry: a service user’s first person account and perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Gray

Abstract

Dr. Ben Gray is an academic and researcher in the field of mental health and was also diagnosed (or rather labelled) with schizophrenia in 2003, when he spent a total of 12 months in a mental health hospital. In this article, he relates his personal experience and story to make a polemical and admittedly one-sided case against traditional psychiatry and compulsory medical treatment. He ties his experience to a modern anti-psychiatry inspired by the radical works of Laing, Szasz, Basaglia and Foucault, explores what Laing might call a contemporary ‘politics of experience’. He concludes that there needs to be more attention paid to voice hearers’ stories and accounts of mental illness, which he links to the rise of democratic psychiatry and the growth of the hearing voices movement, headed by organisations such as Intervoice, Asylum Magazine, MindFreedom, Working to Recovery and the Hearing Voices Network. This personal account is also written partly in response to The Power of Psychiatry, by P. Miller and N. Rose (1986, Cambridge: Polity) and Governing the Soul: The shaping of the private self, by N. Rose (1999, London: Free Association Books), that suggest a growth in subtle, gentle and confessional ‘techniques of self’ (such as talking therapies, counselling, psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy) to regulate ‘problem populations’ such as those with mild mental illness. This personal account suggests that psychiatry is the opposite because it is paternalistic, forced, coercive, disempowering and punitive against people with severe mental illness under Section.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Gray, 2019. "The power of psychiatry: a service user’s first person account and perspective," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 178-183, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:178-183
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1542022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2018.1542022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2018.1542022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:178-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.