Author
Listed:
- Andrea L. Wright
- Lisa J. Phillips
- Shayden Bryce
- Catherine Morey-Nase
- Kelly Allott
Abstract
Background: Cognitive deficits are a risk factor for psychosis onset and are associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Few studies, however, have examined the lived experience of these impairments, particularly in people with emerging psychosis. This qualitative study explored how individuals with early psychosis experienced cognitive functioning and its relationship with psychosocial functioning.Methods: Ten participants, aged 18 to 25, were recruited from an early psychosis assessment and treatment service. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview and analyzed using thematic analysis. The results revealed five overarching themes: 1) Cognitive Impairments; 2) Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Functioning; 3) Impact of Cognitive Impairments on Self-Concept; 4) Relationship between Cognitive Impairments and Treatment; 5) Cognitive Impairments – Helpers and Hindrances.Results: Cognitive deficits were experienced as pervasive in early psychosis, negatively affecting everyday functioning and self-concept, yet were not a perceived barrier to psychological management. There was both a perceived need for and an awareness of therapeutic interventions and lifestyle changes that may help alleviate cognitive difficulties.Conclusions: Subjective cognitive impairments are disruptive in early psychosis and should be routinely investigated in treatment. Cognitive remediation, compensation and lifestyle modifications may be ideal methods of supporting cognitive function in individuals with early psychosis.
Suggested Citation
Andrea L. Wright & Lisa J. Phillips & Shayden Bryce & Catherine Morey-Nase & Kelly Allott, 2019.
"Subjective experiences of cognitive functioning in early psychosis: a qualitative study,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 63-74, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:63-74
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1571623
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:63-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.